Cette série explore les défis complexes et en constante évolution de la sécurité contemporaine. Elle examine des questions critiques telles que le terrorisme international, la cybersécurité, les migrations et l'impact du changement climatique sur la stabilité mondiale. En offrant une analyse de pointe et des perspectives à jour, elle propose des éclairages sur les menaces émergentes et les solutions établies dans un paysage international dynamique.
Focusing on the ethical and intellectual challenges, this book explores the complexities surrounding the establishment of formal humanitarian limits on weaponry. It delves into the dilemmas faced by policymakers and the implications of regulating arms in conflict scenarios, highlighting the balance between military necessity and humanitarian considerations. Through a critical lens, it encourages readers to reflect on the moral responsibilities involved in weaponry and the impact of these decisions on global humanitarian efforts.
This book examines the effectiveness of multilateralism in ensuring collective security and, in particular, the EU's role in this process. In 1992, shortly after the end of the Cold War, a Security Council Summit in New York reaffirmed the salience of the system of collective security and stated the determination of the Heads of State to maintain it as the prime international instrument for preserving peace. Twenty years later, however, the record of collective security as well as of multilateralism has not been very encouraging. The system of collective security, as enshrined in the United Nations (UN) Charter, failed repeatedly to accomplish its mandate in the 1990s and has led to controversial debates in the United States and Europe that reached a climax during the Iraq crisis in 2002/03. The volume draws upon both theoretical and empirical research to answer the following core questions: What are the reasons that have made multilateralism either effective or ineffective in the field of peacekeeping, peace preservation and peacebuilding? How can multilateralism be made more effective? How can attempts made by Europe to render UN multilateralism in the security area more efficient be assessed? This book will be of much interest to students of peacebuilding/peacekeeping, EU policy, the UN, security studies and IR in general.
Exploring the legitimacy of using force in international relations, this book delves into the specific conditions that must be met for such decisions to be considered justified. It analyzes various frameworks and theories, providing insights into the moral and legal implications of military intervention. Through case studies and theoretical discussions, the author challenges conventional notions and encourages a nuanced understanding of power dynamics on the global stage.
The book explores the evolving concept of universal jurisdiction and its implications for global justice. It delves into the practice of holding individuals accountable for serious crimes regardless of where they were committed, highlighting the challenges and consequences of this expanding legal framework. Through a comprehensive analysis, it addresses the intersection of law, morality, and international relations in the quest for justice on a global scale.
The author provides a firsthand account of the Yugoslav conflict, contrasting media portrayals with the stark realities faced while serving as an EU monitor. Through personal experiences, the book sheds light on the complexities and nuances of the situation, aiming to deepen readers' understanding of the conflict beyond sensationalized narratives.
Focusing on Anglo-American defense relations, the book explores the critical period from the Nassau Summit in 1962 to the conclusion of the Johnson Administration in 1968. It analyzes diplomatic strategies, military collaborations, and the geopolitical context that shaped the alliance, providing insights into the evolving dynamics between the two nations during a pivotal time in history.
Focusing on Bill Clinton's foreign policy from 1992 to 2000, this volume highlights his adaptation of the previous administration's 'New World Order' approach while navigating the evolving dynamics with George W. Bush's 'Americanist' stance. It delves into the complexities of international relations during this pivotal period, showcasing how Clinton's strategies shaped America's role on the global stage.
Focusing on the intricacies of US foreign policy decision-making regarding Iran, this study explores the broader implications for Middle Eastern relations. It delves into historical contexts, strategic interests, and the evolving dynamics between the US and Iran, providing insights into how these factors shape regional stability and international diplomacy.
This volume provides an overview of the evolution of NATO, alliances and global security governance in the twenty-first century. For so-long the cornerstone of the transatlantic partnership, the evolution of NATO has profound implications for the co-operative or competitive nature of transatlantic relations and regional and global security governance. As NATO moves into the twenty-first century its role, purpose, utility and very existence as the core transatlantic security alliance is increasingly questioned. For many observers with a more profound understanding of the evolution of NATO, such self-doubt has been a constant feature of NATO throughout its existence. But contemporary debates that question the utility of NATO and its collective security role do appear more strident, extreme and are expressed in a more determined fashion than arguments between allies on how best to secure the Cold War collective defence role. The Iraq War widened the spectrum of opinion as to NATO's future to an unprecedented degree. An interesting feature of this intense debate is that only the extremes tend to prick public consciousness -- NATO as train-wreck or NATO in robust and rude health. Understanding NATO in the 21st Century will appeal to students of NATO, international security and international relations in general.
