This interpretation of The Prince presents it as a nuanced critique of the prevailing religion of Machiavelli's era, rather than a straightforward political guide or patriotic manifesto. The author explores the text's artistic elements and underlying arguments, offering fresh insights into its philosophical and theological implications. By reframing Machiavelli's work, the analysis invites readers to reconsider its significance in the context of religious and political discourse of the time.
Exploring the interplay between religion and psychology, this book features contributions from leading scholars, offering a comprehensive examination of their current relationship. It serves as a vital resource for students and researchers in the psychology of religion, addressing key issues that highlight the complexities and nuances of how these two fields intersect.
"This book provides a contemporary picture of what it looks like for women state level political candidates to run for office during times of insurgency politics and highlights the relevance of the Trump effect for women running for state legislative seats during the 2018 and 2020 election cycles"--
This Element consists of three parts. 'What Freud Said' a summary of Freud's psychology of religion. 'What Freud got Wrong' surveys the history of the multidisciplinary critiques levelled at his interpretative strategies. 'Towards a Revised Psychoanalytic Theory of Religion' suggests employing a psychoanalytic theory of religion.