Key problems in understanding Plato's writings are explored, offering critical evaluations of various interpretive approaches to his dialogues. The book articulates and defends a new, plausible method for interpreting Plato, providing readers with fresh insights into his philosophical ideas.
This book synthesizes over 15 years of research on terrorism, secession, and related ethical issues like civil disobedience and political violence. It aims to deepen understanding of these complex problems and encourages ongoing reflection and analysis. The author acknowledges contributions from various scholars in shaping the work.
Focusing on the interplay between law and race, this book delves into the complexities of constitutional interpretation, international law, and global justice. It examines the nature and significance of rights while addressing the profound impact of race and racism on legal frameworks. Through this lens, it challenges conventional understandings and emphasizes the need for a more inclusive approach to law and justice.
Socrates and Justice
J. Angelo Corlett's "Interpreting Plato Socratically" explores the Platonic Question, challenging the Mouthpiece Interpretation of Plato's dialogues. Corlett argues against attributing Socratic views to Plato, emphasizing that Socrates raises questions rather than providing definitive answers. The book offers a rigorous examination of justice and related themes in Plato's works.
A provocative and lucid defense of retributivism against several long-standing criticisms. The author explores the matter of reparations for past wrongs in the case of crimes committed against Native Americans by the United States Government. Unequaled in its depth and scope of discussion the book delves deeply into particular concerns with retributivism, responsibility, and certain areas of compensation.