After centuries of neglect there is renewed interest in the life and works of Lucius Annaeus Seneca (or Seneca the Younger, c 4 BCE-65 CE). At one time an advisor at court to Nero, Seneca and his political career came to ruin when he was implicated in a later plot to kill the capricious and matricidal emperor, and compelled to commit suicide. Discredited through collusion, or at least association, with a notorious and tyrannical regime, Seneca's ideas were for a time also considered derivative of Greek stoicism and thus inferior to the real thing. In this first in-depth introduction to be published for many years, Christopher Star shows what a remarkable statesman, dramatist and philosopher his subject actually was. Seneca's original contributions to political philosophy and the philosophy of the emotions were considerable. He was a favourite authority of Tertullian, who saw Seneca as proto-believer and early humanist. And he is a key figure in the history of ideas and the Renaissance, as well as in literature and drama. This new survey does full justice to his significance.
Christopher Star Livres



Apocalypse and Golden Age
The End of the World in Greek and Roman Thought
- 320pages
- 12 heures de lecture
Exploring the dualities of apocalyptic thought, this book delves into the contrasting themes of destruction and renewal. It examines historical and contemporary perspectives, offering insights into how these ideas shape cultural narratives and influence societal beliefs. By analyzing various texts and contexts, it enhances our comprehension of how apocalyptic visions can lead to both fear and hope, ultimately enriching discussions surrounding the concept of a "Golden Age."
The Empire of the Self
Self-Command and Political Speech in Seneca and Petronius
- 312pages
- 11 heures de lecture
The book explores the intriguing connection between two seemingly opposing writers, focusing on how their imperial speech structures serve as a means of self-revelation. By analyzing their works, the author uncovers a shared perspective that challenges conventional views of their rivalry, suggesting that their narratives reflect deeper insights into identity and power dynamics. This examination offers a fresh understanding of both writers and the complexities of their literary contributions.