Douglas Walton est un universitaire canadien réputé pour ses travaux approfondis sur l'argumentation, les sophismes et la logique informelle. Ses recherches ont trouvé des applications pratiques dans l'élaboration d'arguments juridiques et le développement de l'intelligence artificielle. Attirant des étudiants du monde entier, les théories de Walton continuent d'inspirer et trouvent une application croissante, notamment dans le domaine de l'informatique. Ses contributions significatives à la théorie de l'argumentation ont obtenu une reconnaissance internationale.
This book, written by a leading expert, and based on the latest research, shows how to apply methods of argumentation to a range of interesting examples. Written in a nontechnical style, the book explains what you most need to know by applying the methods to many real examples of arguments found in everyday conversational exchanges and legal argumentation.
The exploration of fallacy in this book unfolds through an examination of Aristotle's reasoning mistakes and sophisms, enriched by the insights of pragma-dialecticians. It culminates in the development of a 'new' pragmatic theory, offering a fresh perspective on logical errors and their implications in reasoning.
This book explains how burden of proof and presumption work as powerful devices in argumentation, based on studying many clearly explained legal and non-legal examples.
Focusing on the dynamics of reasoning in legal contexts, Douglas Walton introduces a novel model that integrates argumentation theory with the law of evidence. This approach challenges traditional deductive and inductive logic by embracing a broader definition of "reasonable" legal argumentation as a dynamic conversation. By redefining relevance and probative weight through pragmatic criteria, Walton emphasizes the importance of plausible evidence over absolute truth, offering fresh insights into legal reasoning and argument evaluation.
Exploring the significance of abductive inference, this book delves into its application in everyday reasoning and the context of legal evidence. It examines how this form of reasoning helps individuals draw conclusions from incomplete information, highlighting its importance in argumentative discourse and judicial processes. By analyzing various scenarios, the work emphasizes the interplay between logic, reasoning, and practical decision-making in both personal and legal frameworks.
The book introduces a method for critically assessing the relevance of arguments through case studies, blending insights from argumentation theory, logic, and artificial intelligence. It aims to enhance understanding for scholars and students in the fields of argumentation and rhetoric, providing a fresh perspective on evaluating arguments' significance and effectiveness.
This first book in the Applied Logic Series by Doug Walton explores the fallacies of ambiguity in practical reasoning. It addresses the growing interest in analyzing human reasoning across various fields, such as AI, philosophy, and linguistics, and highlights Walton's contributions to developing applicable formal logical systems.
Provides a systematic analysis of many common argumentation schemes.
The book offers a comprehensive examination of various methods used for argument identification, presenting a systematic survey and clarification of existing tests. Walton assesses their effectiveness, providing insights into the nuances of argumentation analysis. This work is essential for understanding the complexities of identifying arguments in diverse contexts, making it a valuable resource for scholars and practitioners in the field.
"Scare Tactics" explores the reasoning behind fear-based arguments, traditionally seen as fallacies. Through case studies from various fields, it analyzes how these arguments persuade and evaluates their validity. The book aims to clarify their structure and offers methods for identifying and assessing their use, appealing to a wide audience in academia and beyond.