Owen Fiss est professeur émérite de droit à l'Université de Yale. Son travail explore la théorie juridique, le droit constitutionnel et la procédure judiciaire. Fiss est reconnu pour son examen approfondi des principes fondamentaux de justice et d'égalité au sein du système juridique. Ses écrits offrent des aperçus pénétrants sur la manière dont le droit façonne et reflète la société.
The book delves into contemporary free-speech challenges, exploring the tension between liberal principles of equality and freedom within current social frameworks. Professor Fiss speculates on the potential role of the state in promoting vibrant public discourse, addressing how these concepts interact in today's society.
Exploring the intersection of national security and constitutional law, this volume reflects Owen Fiss's shift from civil procedure to addressing the legal implications of the War on Terror. He examines critical issues from Guantanamo to drone warfare, highlighting the erosion of individual rights and the judiciary's failure to challenge governmental overreach. Fiss's work serves as a crucial discourse on the threats to constitutional protections posed by legislative and administrative actions in the name of public safety, making it vital for those concerned about civil liberties today.
In Why We Vote, renowned legal scholar Owen Fiss offers a bold and daring reconstruction of judicial doctrine that underscores the US Constitution's commitment to the expansion of democracy. Each chapter points to landmark Supreme Court decisions that have either enhanced the citizens' enjoyment of the right to vote or guaranteed feasible access to the ballot for independent candidates and new political parties. Fiss also shifts the focus from equal protection of the laws to the freedom that democracy generates--the right of those who are ruled to choose their rulers.
The Law As It Could Be gathers Fiss's most important work on procedure, adjudication and public reason, introduced by the author and including contextual introductions for each piece - some of which are among the most cited in 20th Century American legal studies. schovat popis