This textbook explores the groundbreaking logical tools from the mid-1980s that model changes in belief and knowledge. It blends discursive and formal chapters, making it suitable for all university levels. With comprehensive coverage, it serves both students and specialists in belief dynamics and related fields.
The book delves into the logic of theory change, utilizing formal models to explore shifts in belief states and databases. It discusses AGM operations, expanded representations of belief states, and introduces change operators beyond the original framework. The text also examines iterated change, practical applications of the model, its ties to other formal frameworks, and critiques of the existing model, providing a comprehensive look at the dynamics of belief revision.
The book critically explores the representation of belief selection within the standard model of belief change, focusing on the concepts of possible worlds and infinite remainders. It delves into the implications and challenges of these frameworks, offering insights into how they influence our understanding of belief dynamics. Through this examination, it aims to shed light on the complexities involved in the process of choosing what to believe.
This Element offers a broad perspective on responsibility for health. It investigates responsibilities in the prevention of disease and accidents, and in the creation of healthcare for all. It explores the professional responsibilities of physicians and nurses, and discusses the responsibilities that we all have for our own health.
This book outlines argumentative tools and strategies for guiding policy decisions amid significant uncertainty. Contributing authors delve into philosophical and argumentation analysis methods, demonstrating their application in structuring discussions on complex policy issues. The first section systematically addresses decision-making when multiple perspectives and unknown consequences are present. Readers will learn how to utilize argumentation tools for prioritizing uncertain dangers, framing decisions, selecting appropriate time frames, and systematically evaluating various options. The second section presents case studies illustrating argumentation in practice across areas such as climate geoengineering, water governance, synthetic biology, nuclear waste, and financial markets. One example involves applying argumentation analysis to proposals for addressing climate change through technological interventions, like dispersing reflective aerosols in the stratosphere. Despite thorough investigations, uncertainties about potential risks persist. Conventional risk analysis often falls short, as it assumes all risks are identified. In contrast, the argumentative approach to uncertainty management effectively organizes discussions, providing a framework for navigating complex decision-making scenarios.