En savoir plus sur le livre
The idea of a "brotherhood of man" is not universally accepted; rather, it is shaped by history. Philosopher Alain Finkielkraut presents an unsettling reflection on the twentieth century, urging a reevaluation of our beliefs about universalism and humanism. While many view humanist ideals as a counter to nationalism, Finkielkraut critiques the abstract notion of universalism by highlighting the horrific crimes committed by "civilized" Europe in its name. He also addresses the darker aspects of unreflective nationalism, condemning the dangerous claims of ethnic purity. However, rather than offering a typical critique of nationalism, he defends its underlying need for belonging, drawing on the experiences of refugees from Hitler's Germany to illustrate this point. Finkielkraut emphasizes that cultural relativism and the tolerance of other cultures are relatively recent developments in Western history. He explores the distinctions between historical racism and the ideologies of modern genocidal movements, which shift the blame for misfortune from the self to identifiable groups. This radical racism denies personal responsibility, suggesting that evil can be eradicated in others. Engaging with thinkers like Plato and Hannah Arendt, Finkielkraut’s work serves as a troubling indictment of contemporary society, embracing the complexities of human life while offering a glimmer of hope amidst the chaos.
Achat du livre
In the Name of Humanity, Alain Finkielkraut, Judith Friedlander
- Langue
- Année de publication
- 1999
- Reliure
- (rigide)
Modes de paiement
Il manque plus que ton avis ici.
- Titre
- In the Name of Humanity
- Sous-titre
- reflections on the twentieth century
- Langue
- Anglais
- Auteurs
- Alain Finkielkraut, Judith Friedlander
- Éditeur
- Columbia University Press
- Publié
- 1999
- Format
- rigide
- Pages
- 133
- ISBN10
- 0231110200
- ISBN13
- 9780231110204
- Séries
- Catégories
- Évaluation
- 4 sur 5
- Description
- The idea of a "brotherhood of man" is not universally accepted; rather, it is shaped by history. Philosopher Alain Finkielkraut presents an unsettling reflection on the twentieth century, urging a reevaluation of our beliefs about universalism and humanism. While many view humanist ideals as a counter to nationalism, Finkielkraut critiques the abstract notion of universalism by highlighting the horrific crimes committed by "civilized" Europe in its name. He also addresses the darker aspects of unreflective nationalism, condemning the dangerous claims of ethnic purity. However, rather than offering a typical critique of nationalism, he defends its underlying need for belonging, drawing on the experiences of refugees from Hitler's Germany to illustrate this point. Finkielkraut emphasizes that cultural relativism and the tolerance of other cultures are relatively recent developments in Western history. He explores the distinctions between historical racism and the ideologies of modern genocidal movements, which shift the blame for misfortune from the self to identifiable groups. This radical racism denies personal responsibility, suggesting that evil can be eradicated in others. Engaging with thinkers like Plato and Hannah Arendt, Finkielkraut’s work serves as a troubling indictment of contemporary society, embracing the complexities of human life while offering a glimmer of hope amidst the chaos.