Paramètres
- 330pages
- 12 heures de lecture
En savoir plus sur le livre
Militarizing Sri Lanka is a study of the militarization that has buttressed the war between the Sri Lankan state and the LTTE for over two decades. It highlights militarization as a process through which the ideology of militarism is shaped and shared in a manner that makes militant solutions to conflict a part of institutional structures and ways of thought. It foregrounds militarization as activity and agency, capable of adaptation and transforming society in significant ways; and as a deeply gendered, contingent and shifting process. It also analyzes both the construction and resistance to militarization and militarism, but in a manner that draws attention to their relationality rather than as self-evidently oppositional categories.
Achat du livre
Militarizing Sri Lanka, Neloufer de Mel
- Langue
- Année de publication
- 2007
- product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
- (souple),
- État du livre
- Abîmé
- Prix
- 26,37 €
Modes de paiement
Personne n'a encore évalué .
- Titre
- Militarizing Sri Lanka
- Sous-titre
- Popular Culture, Memory and Narrative in the Armed Conflict
- Langue
- Anglais
- Auteurs
- Neloufer de Mel
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications Pvt. Ltd
- Publié
- 2007
- Format
- souple
- Pages
- 330
- ISBN10
- 0761936351
- ISBN13
- 9780761936350
- Séries
- Mots clés
- Description
- Militarizing Sri Lanka is a study of the militarization that has buttressed the war between the Sri Lankan state and the LTTE for over two decades. It highlights militarization as a process through which the ideology of militarism is shaped and shared in a manner that makes militant solutions to conflict a part of institutional structures and ways of thought. It foregrounds militarization as activity and agency, capable of adaptation and transforming society in significant ways; and as a deeply gendered, contingent and shifting process. It also analyzes both the construction and resistance to militarization and militarism, but in a manner that draws attention to their relationality rather than as self-evidently oppositional categories.