Évaluation du livre
En savoir plus sur le livre
Volume 99 of Harvard Studies in Classical Philology includes the following Nancy Felson, “Vicarious Fictive Deixis in Pindar’s Pythian Four”; Douglas E. Gerber, “Pindar, Nemean A Commentary”; Jennifer Clarke Kosak, “Therapeutic Touch and Sophokles’ Philoktetes ”; F. S. Naiden, “The Prospective Imperfect in Herodotus”; Thomas A. Schmitz, “‘I Hate All Common Things’: The Reader’s Role in Callimachus’ Aetia Prologue”; Dimitrios Yatromanolakis, “Alexandrian Sappho Revisited”; John T. Ramsey, “Mithridates, the Banner of Ch’ih-yu, and the Comet Coin”; Alexander Jones, “Geminus and the Isia”; Benjamin Victor, “Further Remarks on the Andria of Terence”; Peter E. Knox, “Lucretius on the Narrow Road”; Francis Cairns, “Virgil Eclogue 1.1–2: A Literary Programme?”; Michael Hendry, “ Epidaurus, Epirus,…Epidamnus? Vergil Georgics 3.44”; Charles Segal, “Ovid’s Meleager and the Trials of Gender and Genre”; John Hunt, “Readings in Apollonius of Tyre ”; Bernard Frischer et al., “Word-Order Transference between Latin and The Relative Position of the Accusative Direct Object and the Governing Verb in Cassius Dio and Other Greek and Roman Prose Authors”; and Craig Kallendorf, “Historicizing the ‘Harvard School’: Pessimistic Readings of the Aeneid in Italian Renaissance Scholarship.”
Achat du livre
Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. Volume 99, Collectif d'auteurs
- Langue
- Année de publication
- 1999
- Reliure
- (rigide)
Modes de paiement
Il manque plus que ton avis ici.
- Titre
- Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. Volume 99
- Langue
- Anglais
- Auteurs
- Collectif d'auteurs
- Éditeur
- Harvard University Press
- Publié
- 1999
- Format
- rigide
- Pages
- 425
- ISBN10
- 0674379470
- ISBN13
- 9780674379473
- Séries
- Catégories
- Mots clés
- Manuels universitaires, Philologie
- Évaluation
- 5 sur 5
- Description
- Volume 99 of Harvard Studies in Classical Philology includes the following Nancy Felson, “Vicarious Fictive Deixis in Pindar’s Pythian Four”; Douglas E. Gerber, “Pindar, Nemean A Commentary”; Jennifer Clarke Kosak, “Therapeutic Touch and Sophokles’ Philoktetes ”; F. S. Naiden, “The Prospective Imperfect in Herodotus”; Thomas A. Schmitz, “‘I Hate All Common Things’: The Reader’s Role in Callimachus’ Aetia Prologue”; Dimitrios Yatromanolakis, “Alexandrian Sappho Revisited”; John T. Ramsey, “Mithridates, the Banner of Ch’ih-yu, and the Comet Coin”; Alexander Jones, “Geminus and the Isia”; Benjamin Victor, “Further Remarks on the Andria of Terence”; Peter E. Knox, “Lucretius on the Narrow Road”; Francis Cairns, “Virgil Eclogue 1.1–2: A Literary Programme?”; Michael Hendry, “ Epidaurus, Epirus,…Epidamnus? Vergil Georgics 3.44”; Charles Segal, “Ovid’s Meleager and the Trials of Gender and Genre”; John Hunt, “Readings in Apollonius of Tyre ”; Bernard Frischer et al., “Word-Order Transference between Latin and The Relative Position of the Accusative Direct Object and the Governing Verb in Cassius Dio and Other Greek and Roman Prose Authors”; and Craig Kallendorf, “Historicizing the ‘Harvard School’: Pessimistic Readings of the Aeneid in Italian Renaissance Scholarship.”